From Soviet Shadows to Digital Eyes: Civilian Participation and the Transformation of State Surveillance in Ukraine Through the Lens of Foucauldian Discipline and Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/kjsfgm25Keywords:
Surveillance, Ukraine, War, Foucault, Digital Control.Abstract
Since gaining independence in 1991, Ukraine has undergone a profound transformation in the nature of state surveillance, shaped by its Soviet legacy, digital innovation, and intensifying conflict with Russia. The widespread adoption of smartphones, social media platforms, and open-source intelligence (OSINT) tools has enabled civilians to become direct contributors to surveillance processes, thereby reshaping traditional power relations between the state and its population. This participatory transformation has become particularly pronounced following the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the full-scale invasion in 2022, both of which significantly intensified Ukraine’s reliance on surveillance technologies under the rationale of national defence. Through smartphone-based reporting, social media activism, and grassroots war crime documentation, civilians now play a pivotal role in intelligence gathering and open-source investigations of alleged human rights violations. This study employs a qualitative methodology--combining historical analysis, case study research, and reviews of legislative and technological developments--to examine the evolution of Ukraine’s surveillance apparatus. The analysis is grounded in Michel Foucault’s theory of disciplinary power, and supplemented by Gilles Deleuze’s concept of “societies of control” and Haggerty and Ericson’s “surveillant assemblage”. These theoretical lenses reveal a hybrid structure where remnants of centralized, top-down monitoring persist alongside emerging decentralized, data-driven modalities influenced by growing civilian engagement.
Downloads
References
[1] Pietsch, B., Dixon, R., & Suliman. A Russian soldier is sentenced to life for killing a civilian. The Washington Post. 2023. Information on: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/23/ukraine-war-crimes-shishimarin-russia/.
[2] Harwell, D. Ukraine’s digital army is harnessing the internet to fight Russia. The Washington Post. 2022. Information on: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/10/ukraine-civilian-surveillance/.
[3] Lyon, D. Surveillance. Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 2014, 1 (2): 1 - 13.
[4] Hogue, S. Civilian surveillance in the war in Ukraine: Mobilizing the agency of the observers of war. Surveillance & Society, 2023, 21 (1): 109 - 113.
[5] Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology, 51 (4), 605 – 622.
[6] Knight, A. The KGB: Police and politics in the Soviet Union. Unwin Hyman, 1993.
[7] Kharkhordin, O. The collective and the individual in Russia: A study of practices. University of California Press, 1999.
[8] Rose, R., & Mishler, W. Comparing democratic values in consolidated and unconsolidated democracies. In D. Pollack, J. Jacobs, O. Müller, & G. Pickel (Eds.), Political culture in post-communist Europe, 2005: 73 - 93.
[9] Bohdan, S. Ukraine adopts new law on personal data protection. Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 2011, 110: 16 - 17.
[10] Murgia, M. Ukraine uses Clearview AI to identify dead Russian soldiers. Financial Times. 2022. Information on: https://www.ft.com/content/bc9eec79-04aa-4a8f-b6fc-bd9023d98c71.
[11] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Report on civilian casualties in Ukraine from February 2022 to March 2025. 2025. Information on: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/reports/report-civilian-casualties-ukraine-february-2022-march-2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.