Peter Singer's Theory of International Aid: Core content, Questioning and Defense

Authors

  • Siyuan Jiang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5h14dk57

Keywords:

International Aid, Peter Singer, Moral Obligation, Effective Altruism, Global Poverty.

Abstract

Since the 21st century, people around the world have shown unprecedented concern for disasters occurring overseas, but the effectiveness of international aid has failed to meet expectations. In order to encourage rich people to contribute to international aids. Peter Singer has put forward a theory on international aid, arguing that against the backdrop of globalization and the development of Internet technology, people have a moral obligation to provide international aid. Singer contends that wealthy countries and individuals should provide global assistance because they have the ability to do so without sacrificing something more important. However, Singer's theory faces numerous challenges. This article will introduce the three most representative challenges that Peter Singer faces, as well as Peter Singer's own supplementation and reinforcement of his theory in response to these challenges. Finally, based on the author's summary of Singer and other thinkers, regarding the topic of international aid, the author puts forward his own solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Information on: https://unstats.un.org/UNSDWebsite/undatacommons/.

[2] Singer, P. The Life You Can Save. New York: Random House, 2009.

[3] Singer, P. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

[4] Lin Tianyu. An Analysis of France's Interest Protection in Africa after the Cold War. China Foreign Affairs University, 2022.

[5] Wang Baofeng. On the Normative Proposition of "We Should Do the Greatest Good as Much as Possible". Jilin University, 2024.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2025

How to Cite

Jiang, S. (2025). Peter Singer’s Theory of International Aid: Core content, Questioning and Defense. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 53, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.54097/5h14dk57