Struggles, Choices, Outcomes: Divergent Responses to Western Pressure in 19th Century China and Japan

Authors

  • Yiming Zang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/q1k2qe28

Keywords:

Western pressure, self-strengthening movement, Meiji restoration, industrial revolution, globalization.

Abstract

In the 19th century, both China and Japan faced increasing pressure from the expanding Western powers, yet their responses diverged significantly, resulting to contrasting outcomes. This paper examines the struggles, choices and outcomes of their interactions with the West, highlighting the factor that shaped the national trajectories. While China under Qing dynasty resisted the engagement of Western influence, Japan embraced Westernization during Meiji Restoration. The responses of resisting and embracing of the two states facilitated the divergence, deciding on different destinies of being successful in the following routes and stagnating politically and economically. By analyzing what political decisions the governments have made, what outcomes were brought up having made their political decisions, economic outcomes and international influences. This study argues that the proactive approaches conducted by Japan ensured its strength and sovereignty, whereas the reactive approaches of China led to prolonged social, political and economic instability. This finding also contributes to a broader understanding of the modes of dealing with external pressures and the long-term consequences of different strategic choices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Nakayama Don K. The Opium Wars of China in the Nineteenth Century and America in the Twenty-First. The American surgeon, 2023, 90 (2): 327 - 331.

[2] Cao Yin. The Malacca dilemma of the Raj: the Indian Uprising of 1857, the Second Opium War, and the British proposal of a Kra passage. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 2024, 34 (4): 821 - 836.

[3] Tu Hanzhang, Q. Edward Wang. Beyond the grand narrative: New studies of the Opium War: Editors’ introduction. Chinese Studies in History, 2024, 57 (4): 209 - 213.

[4] Shi Peijie. On Li Hongzhang’s Coastal Defense Measures Under the Sino-Japanese Conflict in the 1870s. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2021), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2021, 559: 574 - 579.

[5] Bo Shiyu, Liu Cong, Zhou Yan. Military investment and the rise of industrial clusters: Evidence from China’s self-strengthening movement. Journal of Development Economics, 2023, 161: 103015.

[6] Qu Jason. Self-Strengthening Movement of Late Qing China: an Intermediate Reform Doomed to Failure. Asian Culture and History, 2016, 8 (2): 148 - 154.

[7] Ericson Mark. Forced Self-Reliance: The Kamakura Bakufu Defense against the Mongol Invasion of Japan. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 2021, 47(2): 277-311.

[8] Ma Debin, Rubin Jared. Ideology and economic change the contrasting paths to the modern economy in late 19th century China and Japan. Journal of Government and Economics, 2024, 15: 100122.

[9] Xie Hongren. The Opium Wars and Capital Accumulation: Comments on Karl Marx’s Perspectives on the Qing and England Recorded in The New York Herald Tribune. World Review of Political Economy, 2023, 14 (4): 535 - 554.

[10] Yasuo Nakano. Asia and Europe in modernising Japan. History of European Ideas, 1995, 20(4-6): 883 - 889.

[11] Sand Jordan, Megumi Matsuyama. Edo-Tokyo and the Meiji Revolution. Journal of Urban History, 2022, 48 (5): 966 - 987.

[12] Masaru Kohno. On the Meiji Restoration: Japan's search for sovereignty? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2001, 1 (2): 265 - 283.

Downloads

Published

02-07-2025

How to Cite

Zang, Y. (2025). Struggles, Choices, Outcomes: Divergent Responses to Western Pressure in 19th Century China and Japan. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 53, 194-198. https://doi.org/10.54097/q1k2qe28