Understanding The Motivations and Perceptions of University Students Tipping Live-Streamers on Douyin: A Qualitative Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xjt7dx47Keywords:
Douyin, tipping behavior, university students, live streaming, Uses and Gratifications, grounded theory, digital consumer behavior.Abstract
This study investigates how to understand and view tipping live-streamers, and analyzes the different psychological and social motivations that students have for tipping live-streamers, on Douyin among Chinese university students. Despite the growing phenomenon of virtual gifting in the digital economy of China, exploration of this behavior within student populations is scant. Based on the Uses and Gratifications theory and grounded theory methodology, this study took 20 semi-structured interviews with Douyin users. Analysis revealed three overarching themes: culturally accepted and perceived view of tipping, Affectual Gratification and Affectional Gratification and Ego Boost¥ self-actualization and self-enhancement based motivations. Evidence from interviews shows that tipping behaviour is about more than just what happens in a transaction; it is a part of identity work, a form of digital social belonging, and a practice of economic agency. Implications for digital consumer psychology and live-streaming platforms and content creators.
Downloads
References
[1] Anesbury, Z., Nenycz-Thiel, M., Dawes, J., & Kennedy, R. (2016). How do shoppers behave online? An observational study of online grocery shopping. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(3), 261–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1566
[2] Bareket-Bojmel, L., Moran, S., & Shahar, G. (2016). Strategic self-presentation on Facebook: Personal motives and audience response to online behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 788–795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.033
[3] Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (International ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4] Burroughs, J. E., Chaplin, L. N., Pandelaere, M., Norton, M. I., Ordabayeva, N., Gunz, A., & Dinauer, L. (2013). Using Motivation Theory to Develop a Transformative Consumer Research Agenda for Reducing Materialism in Society. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(1), 18–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.10.046
[5] Ding, W., Pandelaere, M., Slabbinck, H., & Sprott, D. E. (2020). Conspicuous gifting: When and why women (do not) appreciate men's romantic luxury gifts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103945
[6] Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Madathil, C. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2. doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014.
[7] Galak, J., Givi, J., & Williams, E. F. (2016). Why certain gifts are great to give but not to get: A framework for understanding errors in gift giving. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 380–385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416656937
[8] Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers' purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 155–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
[9] Jiang, J., Zhang, Y., Ke, Y., Hawk, S. T., & Qiu, H. (2015). Can't buy me friendship? Peer rejection and adolescent materialism: Implicit self-esteem as a mediator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 48–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.001
[10] Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
[11] Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518
[12] Lee, Y.-C., Yen, C.-H., Chiu, P.-T., King, J.-T., & Fu, W.-T. (2018). Tip me: Tipping is changing social interactions on live streams in China. In CHIEA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery.
[13] Lynn, M. (2015). Explanations of service gratuities and tipping: Evidence from individual differences in tipping motivations and tendencies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 55, 65–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.01.002
[14] Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2019). Is self-regard a sociometer or a hierometer? Self-esteem tracks status and inclusion, narcissism tracks status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(3), 444–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000189
[15] Oktay, J. S. (2012). Grounded Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[16] Sun, Y. J. (2023). Interactivity, Emotion, Consumption: A Sociological Interpretation to Live Streaming Tipping. Journal of Yangtze Normal University, 39(6), 46–53.
[17] Walton, G. M., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Seed and Soil: Psychological Affordances in Contexts Help to Explain Where Wise Interventions Succeed or Fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453
[18] Wu, Y., Niu, G. F., Chen, Z. Z., & Zhang, D. J. (2022). Purchasing social attention by tipping: Materialism predicts online tipping in live-streaming platform through self-enhancement motive. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(3), 468-480. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1973
[19] Xi, D., Xu, W., Tang, L., & Han, B. (2024). The impact of streamer emotions on viewer gifting behavior: evidence from entertainment live streaming. Internet Research, 34(3), 748–783. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2022-0350
[20] Xu, Y., & Ye, Y. X. (2020). Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01607
[21] Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000218
[22] Zeng, X. Y., & Fei, Y. Y. (2023). Para-social Interaction in Live Streaming Economy: Evidence from Douyu Platform. Journal of Finance and Economics, 49(12), 136–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20230517.104
[23] Zhang, X., Xiang, Y., & Hao, L. (2019). Virtual gifting on China's live streaming platforms: Hijacking the online gift economy. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 340–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583260
[24] Zhou, J., Zhou, J., Ding, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). The magic of danmaku: A social interaction perspective of gift sending on live streaming platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.11.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.