Research on the Relationship Between Unemployment Rate and Cybercrime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zt5h2a20Keywords:
Cybercrime, Internet Fraud, Unemployment rates, Internet accessibility.Abstract
While previous literatures on unemployment have primarily focused on its effects on traditional forms of crime, the relationship between unemployment and cybercrime remains underexplores. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how state-level unemployment rates influence the incidence of cybercrime complaints across the United States, using panel data spanning from 2004 to 2019. Drawing the data from the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), the analysis employs both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Fixed Effects (FE) regression models to estimates this relationship. Recognizing the role of technological infrastructure in facilitating or deterring cybercrime, the paper further examines the interaction between unemployment rates and broadband coverage. Results suggest that higher unemployment rates are positively associated with increased cybercrime complaints, especially in areas with widespread internet access, indicating a compounding effect. The findings have policy implications for cybersecurity enforcement and labor market interventions, especially during periods of economic downturn.
Downloads
References
[1] Ewuzie O C, Obioma N R, Gift U O, Hayford E I, Chinaza O J, Udegbunam A R. Youth Unemployment and Cybercrime in Nigeria [J]. African Renaissance, 2023, 20 (2).
[2] Hameed I, Naqvi S A A. An Analysis of the factors affecting Cybercrime against individuals in Pakistan [C]. 2021 15th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST). IEEE, 2023: 1–6.
[3] Chen S, Hao M, Ding F, Jiang D, Dong J, Zhang S, Gao C. Exploring the global geography of cybercrime and its driving forces [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2023, 10 (1).
[4] Vasilyeva T A, Kuzmenko O V, Stoyanets N V, Artyukhov A E, Bozhenko V V. The depiction of cybercrime victims using data mining techniques [J]. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 2022, (2): 128–135.
[5] Lazarus S, Button M, Kapend R. Exploring the value of feminist theory in understanding digital crimes: Gender and cybercrime types [J]. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 2022, 61 (3): 381–398.
[6] Mohsin K. The internet and its opportunities for cybercrime–interpersonal cybercrime [J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021 [2025-04-02].
[7] Van de Weijer S G, Leukfeldt R, Bernasco W. Determinants of reporting cybercrime: A comparison between identity theft, consumer fraud, and hacking [J]. European Journal of Criminology, 2019, 16 (4): 486–508.
[8] Eling M, Elvedi M, Falco G. The economic impact of extreme cyber risk scenarios [J]. North American Actuarial Journal, 2023, 27 (3): 429–444.
[9] Martin M, Rae J, Krastev S, Gonzalez R, Castel A D. A personal financial risk assessment intervention decreases investment fraud susceptibility in older adults [R/OL]. PsyArXiv, 2020.
[10] Brunner M. Challenges and opportunities in state and local cybercrime enforcement [J]. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 2019, 10: 563.
[11] Waldrop, M. Mitchell. How to hack the hackers: The human side of cybercrime [J]. Nature, 2016, 533 (7602): 53-58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.