The Impact of Singapore's Financial Investment Strategy in Preschool Education on the Teacher-Student Ratio of Different Types of Kindergartens and Its Implications for China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/z2p4gx38Keywords:
Optimizing teacher-student ratio; kindergarten nature; financial subsidies; inclusive preschool education.Abstract
In recent years, Singapore's "fair and high-quality" oriented financial investment mechanism for preschool education has attracted much attention. This article takes Singapore's financial investment strategy in preschool education as the research object, exploring the impact of its differentiated investment mechanism on the teacher-student ratio of kindergartens of different natures. Research has found that Singapore adopts a three-in-one financial investment mechanism of "classified funding, performance binding, and dynamic adjustment", and formulates tiered funding standards according to the nature of kindergartens, linking the achievement of teacher-student ratio standards with financial subsidies. In contrast, there are problems with China's financial investment in preschool education, such as "heavy emphasis on public institutions over private ones" and "heavy emphasis on hardware over manpower", resulting in a relatively high and unstable teacher-student ratio in inclusive private kindergartens. Based on this, this article proposes to dynamically match financial investment with the nature of park operation, education quality, and "basic subsidies+performance rewards", establish a special subsidy fund for teacher-student ratio tilted towards private inclusive parks, and clarify the lower limit of personnel expenditure in preschool education funds. This study draws on the experience of Singapore and is of great significance for China to achieve the goal of "inclusive supply and high-quality services".
Downloads
References
[1] Pang L. Breakthrough, innovation, and prospects of China's preschool public financial investment policy: Analysis based on the per student financial allocation system and per student subsidy system. Education and Economics, 2022, 38(03): 3-8+24. b
[2] Song C. Research on the reconstruction of China's preschool education financial system from the perspective of public finance: A review of "Research on China's Preschool Education Financial System". Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2023, 150(06): 2+153.
[3] Zhou L. Research on the equity of financial investment in inclusive preschool education: A case study of X County in H Province. Educational Science Research, 2024, 357(12): 58-64.
[4] Lei W, Xie J. Research on fiscal support policies for the transformation of private parks to inclusive development under price constraints: Empirical investigation based on 4 cities and 6 districts (counties) in Hubei Province. Education Development Research, 2022, 42(06): 1-7
[5] Yang W, Yuan Y, Yue D. The problems and improvements of financial subsidies for inclusive private kindergartens: Based on the examination of subsidy standards in some regions of China. Education and Economics, 2020, 36(03): 50-57
[6] Wu Q. Evaluation and improvement strategies for quality assurance of kindergarten teachers in China. Research on Preschool Education, 2021, 313(01): 57-66.
[7] Han Z. The effectiveness, problems, and suggestions of public financial support for the reform and development of public kindergartens. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2023, 5(21): 73-79.
[8] Lei W, Li Z. Construction of an inclusive public early childhood education service system from the perspective of finance. Chinese Journal of Education, 2022, 351(07): 36-43.
[9] Li F, Jiang Y. Research on the characteristics and countermeasures of financial investment in preschool education in China: Based on an international comparative perspective. Journal of Education, 2020, 16(01): 43-54.
[10] Liu Y, Zheng X, Song L. The impact path of fiscal subsidies on the quality of inclusive private kindergarten education. Education Research, 2021, 42(04): 25-36.
[11] Pang L, He H, Wang H, Yuan Q. Research on the protection of treatment for kindergarten teachers of different natures: Current situation, reason analysis, and policy suggestions. Teacher Education Research, 2021, 33(03): 38-44.
[12] Xi X. Research on legislative guarantee of financial investment in preschool education: Based on the perspective of policy legalization. Journal of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, 2020, 19(03): 1-8+15.
[13] Kong L, Li Z. Analysis and implications of Singapore's preschool education policies in the past decade: "Making High Quality Preschool Education Available and Affordable". Journal of Hebei Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2022, 24(03): 123-132.
[14] Lim-Ratnam C. Tensions in defining quality pre-school education: the Singapore context. Educational Review, 2012, 65(4): 416–431.
[15] Blau D M. The production of quality in child-care centers: Another look. Applied Developmental Science, 2000, 4(3): 136–148.
[16] Jiang F, Cheng Q. The development of preschool education in Singapore under government funding programs and its implications. Foreign Education Research, 2013, 40(06): 36-43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.