The impact of ESG rating uncertainty on green investors

Authors

  • Ya Lu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/nxjrqj53

Keywords:

ESG rating uncertainty; Green investor; Information asymmetry; Enterprise risk.

Abstract

As global awareness of sustainable development grows, the role of ESG ratings in capital markets has become increasingly prominent. However, the issue of information asymmetry caused by rating discrepancies requires urgent attention. This study uses Chinese listed companies as a sample to investigate the impact of ESG rating discrepancies on green investors. The findings indicate that ESG rating discrepancies significantly inhibit the entry of green investors, and this conclusion remains robust after testing using lag models, variable substitution, and instrumental variable methods. Mechanism analysis indicates that information asymmetry and corporate risk are the core transmission pathways: rating discrepancies exacerbate market information chaos, elevate corporate risk levels, and prompt green investors to adopt avoidance strategies. Heterogeneity tests show that state-owned enterprises are more significantly affected, and companies in heavily polluting industries face more pronounced negative impacts. This study expands the research boundaries of ESG rating discrepancies and recommends that regulatory authorities standardize rating criteria, companies improve the quality of information disclosure, and financial institutions optimize green risk assessment systems to promote the healthy development of the green financial market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hu X, Hua R, Liu Q, et al. The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2023,78:101952.

[2] Berg F, Kölbel J F, Rigobon R. Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings*[J]. Review of Finance, 2022,26(6):1315-1344.

[3] Barnea A, Heinkel R, Kraus A. Green investors and corporate investment[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2005,16(3):332-346.

[4] Chatterji A K, Durand R, Levine D I, et al. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016,37(8):1597-1614.

[5] Avramov D, Cheng S, Lioui A, et al. Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022,145(2, Part B):642-664.

[6] Brandon R G, Krueger P, Schmidt P S. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2021,77(4):104-127.

[7] Wang J, Wang S, Dong M, et al. ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024,91:103043.

[8] Chen Y, Kelly B, Wu W. Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2020,138(2):316-341.

[9] Covrig V, Lau S T, Ng L. Do domestic and foreign fund managers have similar preferences for stock characteristics? A cross-country analysis[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2006,37(3):407-429.

[10] Sun Y, Zheng Z, Dong H. Institutional Investors in Chinese Stock Markets[M]//Cheng S, Li Z. The Chinese Stock Market Volume I: A Retrospect and Analysis from 2002. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015:106-186.

[11] Bai X, Han J, Ma Y, et al. ESG performance, institutional investors’ preference and financing constraints: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Borsa Istanbul Review, 2022,22:S157-S168.

[12] Bazrafshan E. The role of ESG ranking in retail and institutional investors' attention and trading behavior[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023,58:104462.

[13] Chen M T, Yang D P, Zhang W Q, et al. How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises — Empirical evidence from China[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2023,98:106926.

[14] Wei L, Chengshu W. Company ESG performance and institutional investor ownership preferences[J]. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 2023,33(3):287-307.

[15] Davis E P, Steil B. Institutional Investors[M]. The MIT Press, 2001.

[16] [16] Tan Jinsong, Lin Yuchen. The Governance Effects of Institutional Investors on Information Disclosure: Evidence from Institutional Research Behavior [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2016,19(05):115-126.

[17] Brown J A, Forster W R. CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013,112(2):301-312.

[18] Baker S. Sustainable Development[M]. 2nd. Taylor & Francis, 2015.

[19] Khalili N R. Theory and Concept of Sustainability and Sustainable Development[M]//Khalili N R. Practical Sustainability: From Grounded Theory to Emerging Strategies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011:1-22.

[20] Chibane M, Joubrel M. The ESG-efficient frontier under ESG rating uncertainty[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024,67:105881.

[21] Broadstock D C, Chan K, Cheng L T W, et al. The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2021,38:101716.

[22] Kappou K, Oikonomou I. Is There a Gold Social Seal? The Financial Effects of Additions to and Deletions from Social Stock Indices[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016,133(3):533-552.

[23] Park J W, Lee C W. Performance of stock price with changes in SRI governance index[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018,25(6):1121-1129.

[24] Amel-Zadeh A, Serafeim G. Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2018,74(3):87-103.

[25] Dimson E, Marsh P, Staunton M. Divergent ESG Ratings[J]. Journal of Portfolio Management, 2020,47(1):75-87.

[26] Pástor Ľ, Stambaugh R F, Taylor L A. Sustainable investing in equilibrium[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021,142(2):550-571.

[27] Bauer R, Ruof T, Smeets P. Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2021,34(8):3976-4043.

[28] BLANKESPOOR E. The Impact of Information Processing Costs on Firm Disclosure Choice: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2019,57(4):919-967.

[29] BARBER B M, HUANG X, ODEAN T, et al. Attention-Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2022,77(6):3141-3190.

[30] Ozik G, Sadka R, Shen S. Flattening the Illiquidity Curve: Retail Trading During the COVID-19 Lockdown[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2021,56(7):2356-2388.

[31] Zhou Zejian, Gu Wenjing, and San Ziyao. ESG Rating Discrepancies and Analyst Earnings Forecast Accuracy [J]. China Soft Science, 2023(10):164-176.

[32] Dunbar K, Treku D, Sarnie R, et al. What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023,57:104262.

[33] Wang Hui, Lin Weifen, Xie Rui. Environmental Background of Senior Management and Green Investor Entry [J]. Research on Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics, 2022,39(12):173-194.

[34] He Taiming, Li Yipu, Wang Zheng, et al. Does ESG Rating Discrepancy Increase Voluntary Information Disclosure by Listed Companies? [J]. Accounting and Economic Research, 2023,37(03):54-70.

[35] Zhou J, Jin S. Corporate Environmental Protection Behavior and Sustainable Development: The Moderating Role of Green Investors and Green Executive Cognition[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023,20(5).

[36] Hao X, Miao E, Wen S, et al. Executive Green Cognition on Corporate Greenwashing Behavior: Evidence From A-Share Listed Companies in China[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025,34(2):2012-2034.

[37] Li Yabing, Xia Yue, Zhao Zhen. The Impact of Senior Management's Green Awareness on the Performance of Enterprises in Highly Polluting Industries: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2023,40(07):113-123.

[38] Song Min, Zhou Peng, and Si Haitao. Financial Technology and Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises: The Perspective of “Empowerment” and Credit Allocation [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2021(4):138-155.

[39] Yu Wei, Wang Miaojun, Jin Xiangrong. Political Connections and Financing Constraints: Information Effects and Resource Effects [J]. Economic Research, 2012(9):125-139.

[40] Wu W, Johan S A, Rui O M. Institutional Investors, Political Connections, and the Incidence of Regulatory Enforcement Against Corporate Fraud[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016,134(4):709-726.

[41] Tirodkar M, Berkman H. Are polluters shunned? A study on the institutional ownership and returns of polluter stocks[J]. Financial Review, 2023,58(3):513-537.

[42] Gao Y, Xiong X, Feng X. Responsible investment in the Chinese stock market[J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2020,52:101173.

[43] Liu Yunguo, Liu Mengning. Does smog affect the earnings management of heavily polluting enterprises? — An examination based on the political cost hypothesis [J]. Accounting Research, 2015(3):26-33.

[44] [44] Liu Xinghe. Public Pressure, Property Rights Nature, and Corporate Financing Behavior: A Study Based on the “PM2.5 Explosion” Incident [J]. Economic Science, 2016(2):67-80.

Downloads

Published

08-07-2025

How to Cite

Lu, Y. (2025). The impact of ESG rating uncertainty on green investors . Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 54, 250-267. https://doi.org/10.54097/nxjrqj53