A Comparative Study of Ngos Strategies in Diverse Asian Contexts: Case Studies from Hong Kong, Shenzhen, And Indonesia

Sirui He

doi:10.54097/9sq5bp79

Authors

Sirui He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/9sq5bp79

Keywords:

Comparative NGOs; Governance; Social Enterprise; Asia; Disability & Community Development.

Abstract

There is little known about comparative qualitative research on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) operating in differing Asian socio-political contexts. To address this gap, this paper reports on a qualitative comparative case study of three NGOs working in the disability/community development sectors in Hong Kong (Hong Kong Zhuo Xin Strength), Shenzhen, China (Shenzhen Zero One Rare Bone Disease Care Center), and Indonesia (Ragam Foundation). Through document analysis and semi-structured interviews, the paper examines how differing institutional environments and resource landscapes help shape governance structures, funding strategies, and program designs in an NGOs. Major variations – from the established member-driven to a flexible project-based and founder-centric governance structure; and funding strategies that range from state support to social enterprise and entrepreneurial approaches – diversify the ways in which these contexts are interpreted by issues of age and mission under the rubric of Institutional and Resource Dependence theories. The NGOs, while experiencing common challenges of constraints in resources, make different forms of innovations. This study contributes a granular understanding of NGOs operational diversity in Asia, revealing the dynamic interplay between institutional context and organizational strategy, thereby offering a new perspective for research on NGO sustainability and effectiveness in varied settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Lewis D, Kanji N, Themudo NS. Non-governmental organizations and development. Routledge, 2020.

[2] Aall P, Helsing JW. Non-governmental organizations. Responding to Violent Conflicts and Humanitarian Crises: A Guide to Participants, 2021: 53-87.

[3] Nair P. Evolution of the relationship between the state and non‐government organisations: A south Asian perspective. Public Administration and Development, 2011, 31(4): 252-261.

[4] Lewis D. Non-governmental organizations, definitions, and history. In: International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer Cham, 2023: 1-9.

[5] Batley R. Structures and strategies in relationships between non‐government service providers and governments. Public Administration and Development, 2011, 31(4): 306-319.

[6] Mitchell GE. The attributes of effective NGOs and the leadership values associated with a reputation for organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2015, 26(1): 39-57.

[7] Kovach H. Addressing accountability at the global level: The challenges facing international NGOs. In: NGO Accountability. Routledge, 2012: 195-210.

[8] Mikeladze A. Financial management role for NGOs. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 2021, 7(1): 77-98.

[9] Ortega-Rodríguez C, Licerán-Gutiérrez A, Moreno-Albarracín AL. Transparency as a key element in accountability in non-profit organizations: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 2020, 12(14): 5834.

[10] Doh JP, Teegen H. Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: Theory and implications. International Business Review, 2002, 11(6): 665-684.

[11] Mitchell GE. Strategic responses to resource dependence among transnational NGOs registered in the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2014, 25: 67-91.

[12] Shava E. Financial sustainability of NGOs in rural development programmes. Development in Practice, 2021, 31(3): 393-403.

[13] Gent SE, Crescenzi MJB, Menninga EJ, Reid L. The reputation trap of NGO accountability. International Theory, 2015, 7(3): 426-463.

[14] Brendel J, Chen C, Keusch T, Sautner Z. The Value of NGOs in ESG. 2024.

[15] Bódi DC. Challenges and opportunities of non-governmental organizations. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law, 2023, 16(2): 223-230.

[16] Brass JN, Longhofer W, Robinson RS, Schnable A. NGOs and international development: A review of thirty-five years of scholarship. World Development, 2018, 112: 136-149.

[17] Amenta E, Ramsey KM. Institutional theory. Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective, 2010: 15-39.

[18] McKinnon MC, Mascia MB, Yang W, Turner WR, Bonham C. Impact evaluation to communicate and improve conservation non-governmental organization performance: The case of Conservation International. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2015, 370(1681): 20140282.

[19] Abdulkaddir S. The Effect of Accountability on Financial Sustainability of Local NGOs: The Case of NGOs Operating in Addis Ababa. St. Mary’s University, 2021.