A Study on the Multi-Dimensional Equilibrium in Sustainable Tourism Based on an Integrated AHP-Entropy and Dynamic Programming Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dbmv6x95Keywords:
Sustainable Tourism, Ecological Balance, Economic Optimization, Dynamic Optimization.Abstract
Coastal destinations globally are confronting unprecedented cruise tourism expansion, driven by rising disposable incomes and middle-class growth, which generates substantial economic revenue (exceeding $150 billion annually for port economies) while simultaneously straining local infrastructure, compromising resident well-being, and degrading fragile marine ecosystems; compounded by climate change impacts such as sea-level rise and extreme weather events accelerating natural landmark deterioration, iconic regions like Venice and Caribbean islands face critical sustainability trade-offs between short-term profits and irreversible socio-ecological costs. To address this, our study proposes an integrated multi-objective optimization framework dynamically balancing economic benefits, social equity, and environmental conservation through synthesized Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-entropy weighting that quantifies stakeholder priorities (residents > tourists > operators) and cross-dimensional feedback mechanisms; employing dynamic programming with IoT/satellite data inputs (e.g., tourist density, coral bleaching alerts), it continuously adjusts visitor capacity caps, environmental expenditure allocation, and attraction diversification strategies via sensitivity-validated algorithms tested under 12 climate-tourism scenarios. Quantitatively validated across eight global hotspots (including Santorini and Phuket), this model demonstrably reduces ecological damage by 22%, increases resident satisfaction by 35%, and optimizes disaster funding allocation, offering a transferable methodology for sustainable tourism governance in overtourism-affected regions worldwide.
Downloads
References
[1] Khatri K A, Shah K B, Logeshwaran J, et al. Genetic algorithm-based techno-economic optimization of an isolated hybrid energy system [J]. CRF, 2023, 8 (4): 1447 - 1450.
[2] Wang R, Zhang R. Techno-economic analysis and optimization of hybrid energy systems based on hydrogen storage for sustainable energy utilization by a biological-inspired optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 66: 107469.
[3] Luo J, Zhuo W, Liu S, et al. The optimization of carbon emission prediction in low carbon energy economy under big data [J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 14690 - 14702.
[4] Hao X, Li Y, Ren S, et al. The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter? [J]. Journal of environmental management, 2023, 325: 116504.
[5] Alhussan A, El-Kenawy E S M, Saeed M A, et al. green hydrogen production ensemble forecasting based on hybrid dynamic optimization algorithm [J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2023, 11: 1221006.
[6] Peng Y, Song D, Qiu L, et al. Combined prediction model of gas concentration based on indicators dynamic optimization and bi-lstms [J]. Sensors, 2023, 23 (6): 2883.
[7] Ruof J, Mertens M B, Buchholz M, et al. Real-time spatial trajectory planning for urban environments using dynamic optimization [C]//2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 2023: 1 - 7.
[8] Xu K, Xia Y, Zou J, et al. A cluster prediction strategy with the induced mutation for dynamic multi-objective optimization [J]. Information Sciences, 2024, 661: 120193.
[9] Li H, Wang Z, Lan C, et al. A novel dynamic Mult objective optimization algorithm with hierarchical response system [J]. IEEE transactions on computational social systems, 2023, 11 (2): 2494 - 2512.
[10] Li W, Zhang T, Wang R, et al. Multimodal multi-objective optimization: Comparative study of the state-of-the-art [J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2023, 77: 101253.
[11] Oguanobi V U, Joel O T. Geoscientific research's influence on renewable energy policies and ecological balancing [J]. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2024, 7 (02): 073 - 085.
[12] Fu W. Enhancing university campus landscape design through regression analysis: integrating ecological environmental protection [J]. Soft Computing, 2023, 27 (21): 16309 - 16329.
[13] Aizizi Y, Kasimu A, Liang H, et al. Evaluation of ecological space and ecological quality changes in urban agglomeration on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 146: 109896.
[14] Jia Q, Jiao L, Lian X, et al. Linking supply-demand balance of ecosystem services to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomerations[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 92: 104497.
[15] Zhu K, Zhou Q, Cheng Y, et al. regional sustainability: Pressures and responses of tourism economy and ecological environment in the Yangtze River basin, China [J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2023, 11: 1148868.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.