Research on the motivation of knowledge workers from the perspective of self-determination theory

Authors

  • Wanning Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ha866v84

Keywords:

self-determination theory, knowledge worker, incentive mechanism.

Abstract

With the rise of knowledge economy, knowledge workers have become an important source of enterprise competitiveness. How to motivate these employees effectively, especially by improving their intrinsic motivation has become one of the key issues in modern enterprise management. This study explores the motivation mechanism and strategies of knowledge workers from the perspective of self-determination theory. It is found that most of the current researches focus on the discussion of a single dimension of self-determination theory and most of the researches are limited to the western cultural background, ignoring the special needs of knowledge workers in Chinese culture. On this basis, it is proposed that future research should further explore the interaction effect between the needs of ego theory and develop a more perfect incentive model combined with other incentive theories. In addition, we should pay attention to cross-cultural comparative research, especially in the context of Chinese collectivist culture, knowledge workers' demand for incentives. The enterprise should design the incentive scheme according to the local characteristics according to the cultural differences. So as to improve the work performance and innovation ability of the employees. This study provides a new theoretical perspective and practical guidance for the motivation of knowledge workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li Jinbei. Research on Employee Incentive schemes of Two New Generation enterprises: Based on Self-determination Theory [J]. modern business, 2021, 000(003): 83-85.

[2] Lu Xingyuan. An analysis of motivation strategies for new generation employees based on the perspective of self-determination theory [J]. Enterprise technology and development, 2020(8): 3.

[3] Sun Zhi-fu. Motivation of knowledge workers from the perspective of self-determinism [J]. Journal of Chaohu University, 2012(2): 4.

[4] He Dividend, Li Bing. Research on incentive mechanism of knowledge workers from the perspective of two-factor theory [J]. Theory of Chinese commerce, 2020(8): 2.

[5] Huang Jian. Research on motivation strategies of the new generation of post-90s employees from the perspective of self-determination theory [J]. modern business, 2020(14): 2.

[6] Grant A M. The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions.[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008.

[7] Baard P P, Deci E L, Ryan R M. Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Weil‐Being in Two Work Settings1 [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 34(10).

[8] Haack M B, Coghlan D. The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Book Review) [J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis (1993-2002), 1997.

[9] Reeve J, Cheon S H. Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice [J]. Educational Psychologist, 2021, 56(1): 54-77.

[10] Vansteenkiste M , Ryan R M .On psychological growth and vulnerability: basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as an unifying principle [J]. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 2013, 23(3): 263.

[11] Spreitzer G M .Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(5): 1442-1465.

[12] Deci E L, Koestner R, Ryan R M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125(6): 692-700.

[13] Broeck A V D, Howard J L, Vaerenbergh Y V, et al. Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory's multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation [J]. Organizational Psychology Review, 2021(12): 204138662110061.

[14] Ryan R M, Deci E L. Self-Determination Theory and the Role of Basic Psychological Needs in Personality and the Organization of Behavior [J]. 2008.

[15] Alvesson M .Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms [J]. Oxford University Press, 2004.

[16] Marylène Gagné.The Role of Autonomy Support and Autonomy Orientation in Prosocial Behavior Engagement [J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2003, 27(3): 199-223.

[17] Kuvaas B, Buch R, Weibel A, et al. Do Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation relate differently to Employee Outcomes? [J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2017, in press: 244-258.

[18] Deci E L, Connell J P, Ryan R M. Self-Determination in a Work Organization [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(4): 580-590.

[19] Deci E L, Ryan R M. Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health [J]. Canadian Psychology, 2008, 49(3): 182-185.

[20] Ryan R M, Deci E L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. [J]. Am Psychol, 2000, 55(1): 68-78.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2025

How to Cite

Li, W. (2025). Research on the motivation of knowledge workers from the perspective of self-determination theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 56, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.54097/ha866v84