Evaluating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Designing Lesson Plans for Teaching Ideological and Political Education Among Chinese Pre-Service Teachers

Xiaoting Xu

doi:10.54097/2atvp377

Authors

Xiaoting Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2atvp377

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence (AI), lesson plan development, pre-serve teachers, ideological and political education, ERNIE Bot.

Abstract

This qualitative research explores the potential of using an AI tool (i.e., ERNIE Bot) to facilitate Chinese pre-service teachers in developing lesson plans in ideological and political education. A total of seven participants created the initial draft of their own lesson plans and then sought assistance from ERNIE Bot to revise and further develop their lesson plans. A one-on-one semi-structure interview based on AI-TPACK framework was conducted to explore these participants’ perceptions of using this AI tool for lesson plan development. Findings showed that ERNIE Bot provides convenience and operability, enhances the structure of lesson plans, adapts to diverse student needs, and supports multiple assessment designs. Yet, this study also revealed several issues in producing precise, contextually relevant content and expressing emotional subtleties. This study provides insights into the opportunities and challenges presented by integrating AI into lesson plan development, aiming to offer implications for the professional development of future educators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., Williamson, K. M., Long, A. C., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2018). Increasing in-service teacher implementation of classroom management practices through consultation, implementation planning, and participant modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20 (1), 43-59.

[2] Nagro, S. A., Fraser, D. W., & Hooks, S. D. (2019). Lesson planning with engagement in mind: Proactive classroom management strategies for curriculum instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54 (3), 131–140.

[3] Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41 (7), 944-963.

[4] Iqbal, S. A., Ashiq, M., Rehman, S. U., Rashid, S., & Tayyab, N. (2022). Students’ perceptions and experiences of online education in Pakistani universities and higher education institutes during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12 (3), 166.

[5] Sousa, D. A. (2016). How the special needs brain learns. (3rd Ed.). Corwin Press.

[6] Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. The ACM Magazine for Students, 29 (3), 42-46.

[7] Hu, Z.M. (2024). Research on the application of project-based learning focused on core competencies in high school art classes. Modern Primary and Secondary Education, 40 (3).

[8] Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127.

[9] Sundin, M. (2024). Unlocking artificial potential: Investigating the effectiveness of Chat-GPT as an operational tool for lesson planning. [Student dissertation, Örebro University]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-115291.

[10] Powell, W., & Courchesne, S. (2024). Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans. PloS one, 19 (6), 1–15.

[11] Broutın, M. S. T. (2024). Exploring mathematics teacher candidates' instrumentation process of generative artificial intelligence for developing lesson plans. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 14 (1), 165-176.https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1347061.

[12] Wang, Z. (2023, September 8–10). Research on the application of artificial intelligence in ideology and politics class. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management, Wuhan, China. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-9-2023.2340092.

[13] Li, H., & Dong, X. (2022, July). Construction of online ideological and political education platform based on artificial intelligence technology. In International Conference on E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (pp. 129-144). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

[14] CHen, F. (2015, October). Study on Ideological and Political Education. In International Conference on Education, Management and Information Technology (pp. 243-247). Atlantis Press.

[15] Tang, C. (2023). Innovation of ideological and political education based on artificial intelligence technology with wireless network. Eai Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 10 (6).

[16] Luo, J. (2021). Research on the difficulties of ideological and political Education of College students in the New Media Environment. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4 (4).

[17] Liqiong H, Jinnian L, Yifang Z. (2015). Significance and ways of classroom teaching reform of ideological and political theory in colleges and universities. Theory Research, 24.

[18] Jia, Q. (2019). The challenges and reform ways of ideological and political education in colleges and universities. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 3 (1), 39-42.

[19] Han Yi. (2023). Study on applied path of teaching civics in ChatGPT perspective, Teaching in Forestry Area, 7. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDAUTO&filename =LQXJ202307005&v=.

[20] Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 12 (1), 22.

[21] McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence, 171 (18), 1174-1182.

[22] Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2 (3), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7.

[23] Sun, F. (2024, September). Unlocking the potential: Exploring student teachers’ perceptions of human-generated and ChatGPT lesson plans in education [Conference session]. In 2024 10th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2024) (pp. 1413-1421). Atlantis Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-277-4_159.

[24] Lesgold, A. (1986). Toward a theory of curriculum for use in designing intelligent tutoring systems. In H. Mandle & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems. New York: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6350-7_6.

[25] Karpouzis, K. (2023, September). Explainable AI for intelligent tutoring systems [Conference session]. In International Conference on Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Multidisciplinary Applications (pp. 59-70). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

[26] Kinshuk, M. C., Graf, S., & Yang, G. (2009). Adaptivity and personalization in mobile learning. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning (TICL), 8, 163-174.

[27] Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27 (5), 6069-6104.

[28] Hamilton, E., & Owens, A. M. (2022). Computational thinking and participatory teaching as pathways to personalized learning. In Research Anthology on Computational Thinking, Programming, and Robotics in the Classroom (pp. 326-343). IGI Global.

[29] Hoover, K. T., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1975). Learning and teaching in the elementary school. Allyn and Bacon. https://lccn.loc.gov/70089868.

[30] Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science education, 92 (6), 1096-1126.

[31] Jogan, S. N. (2019). An Effective 5 e lesson plan in teaching prose: a model. Online Submission, 6 (50), 11999- 12009.

[32] Lee, I., Park, J., & Yoon, H. G. (2022). Science Teachers’ Theory-Based Teaching: Connecting A Learning Cycle Model to A Lesson Plan. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21 (3), 462.

[33] Wood, J. W., & Miederhoff, J. W. (1988). Adapting lesson plans for the mainstreamed student. The Clearing House, 61 (6), 269-276.

[34] Alanazi, M. H. (2019). A study of the pre-service trainee teachers problems in designing lesson plans. Arab World English Journal, 10 (1), 166-182.

[35] Cuñado, A. G., & Abocejo, F. T. (2019). Lesson planning competency of English major university sophomore students. European Journal of Education Studies, 5 (8), 396-409.

[36] Farrell, T. S. C. (2002). Lesson Planning. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice (pp. 30–39). Cambridge University Press

[37] Lika, M. (2017). The impact of curricula and lesson planning in the teaching process. Academic Journal of Business, 3 (1), 240-247.

[38] Ball, A. L., Knobloch, N. A., & Hoop, S. (2007). The instructional planning experiences of beginning teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48 (2), 56-65.

[39] Dias-Lacy, S. L., & Guirguis, R. V. (2017). Challenges for New Teachers and Ways of Coping with Them. Journal of Education and Learning, 6 (3), 265-272.

[40] Ranawat, R., Venkataraman, A., & Subramanian, L. (2021, June). Collectiveteach: a system to generate and sequence web-annotated lesson plans [Conference session]. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (pp. 1-13).

[41] Stein, H., Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2020). Integration of technology by novice mathematics teachers–what facilitates such integration and what makes it difficult?. Education and Information Technologies, 25 (1), 141-161.

[42] OECD. (2015). How Much Time Do Teachers Spend on Teaching and Non-teaching Activities?. Education Indicators in Focus. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/how-much-time-do-teachers-spend-on-teaching-and-non-teaching-activities_5js64kndz1f3-en.html.

[43] Walker T. (2023). Survey: Teachers work more hours per week than other working adults. National Education Association. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/allnews-articles/survey-teachers-work-more-hours-week other-working-adults.

[44] Baytak, A. (2024). The content analysis of the lesson plans created by ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9 (1), 329-350.

[45] Li, Y., Liu, J., & Yang, S. (2024). Is ChatGPT a Good Middle School Teacher? An Exploration of its Role in Instructional Design. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education, NMDME 2023, October 13–15, 2023, Xi’an, China.

[46] Hunter, J., & Sonnemann, J. (2022). Making time for great teaching: How better government policy can help. Grattan Institute. grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Making-time-for great-teaching-how-better-government-policy-can-help-Grattan-Report.pdf.

[47] Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO. https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/38828.

[48] Stacey, M., Gavin, M., Fitzgerald, S., McGrath-Champ, S., & Wilson, R. (2024). Reducing teachers’ workload or deskilling ‘core’work? Analysis of a policy response to teacher workload demands. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 45 (2), 187-199.

[49] Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61 (3), 460-474.

[50] Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13 (4), 410.

[51] Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52] Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J.K., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for teachers: Practical examples for utilizing artificial intelligence for educational purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10 (3), 200-205.

[53] Barrot, J. S. (2024). ChatGPT as a language learning tool: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29 (2), 1151-1156.

[54] García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279.

[55] Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. 3, 100115.

[56] Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32 (3), 444-452.

[57] Martineau K. (2023). What is generative AI? IBM. https://research.ibm.com/blog/what-is-generative-AI.

[58] Węcel K., Sawiński M., Stro´żyna M., Lewoniewski W., Księżniak E., Stolarski P., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence—friend or foe in fake news campaigns. Economics and Business Review, 9 (2), 41–70.

[59] Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry?. Nature.

[60] Choi, G. W., Kim, S. H., Lee, D., & Moon, J. (2024). Utilizing Generative AI for Instructional Design: Exploring Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. TechTrends, 68, 832–844.

[61] Trust, T., Whalen, J. & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Teacher Education. Contemporary issues in Technology and Teacher Education. https://citejournal.org/volume-23/issue-1-23/editorial/editorial-chatgpt-challenges-opportunities-and-implications-for-teacher-education/.

[62] Yeadon, W., Inyang, O. O., Mizouri, A., Peach, A., & Testrow, C. P. (2023). The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution. Physics Education, 58 (3), 035027.

[63] Kehoe, F. (2023). Leveraging generative AI tools for enhanced lesson planning in initial teacher education at post primary. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7 (2), 172-182.

[64] Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2022). Foundation for the future of higher education or ‘misplaced optimism’? Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. In M. Panda, S. Dehuri, M. R. Patra, P. K. Behera, G. A. Tsihrintzis, S.-B. Cho, & C. A.Coello Coello (Eds.), Innovations in Intelligent Computing and Communication (pp. 17–29). Springer International Publishing.

[65] Yan, L. (2024). Study on the prospects and challenges of artificial intelligence application in ideological and political education. International Conference on Financial Management, Humanities and Social Sciences (ICFMHSS 2024) (pp.259-264). Francis Academic Press.

[66] Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 3833 3840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

[67] Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: pre-service teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 744-755.

[68] Jüttner, M., Boone, W., Park, S., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013). Development and use of a test instrument to measure biology teachers' content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Educational Assess ment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25 (1), 45–67.

[69] Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre‐service teachers with a large‐scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (6), 563-573.

[70] Gatbonton, E. (1999). Investigating experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 83, 35–50.

[71] Watzke, J. L. (2007). Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: Toward a developmental theory of beginning teacher practices. The modern language journal, 91 (1), 63-82.

[72] Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 53 (5).

[73] Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468.

[74] Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9 (1), 60-70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/.

[75] Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as pre-service teachers: What technology preparation is needed?. Journal of Computing in teacher Education, 25 (3), 87-97.

[76] Wilson, M. L., Hall, J. A., & Mulder, D. J. (2022). Assessing digital nativeness in pre-service teachers: Analysis of the digital natives assessment scale and implications for practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54 (2), 249-266.

[77] Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and teacher education, 34, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001.

[78] Stoilescu, D. (2015). A critical examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework: Secondary school mathematics teachers integrating technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52 (4), 514-547.

[79] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.

[80] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.

[81] Thornberg R, Charmaz K. (2014) Grounded theory and theoretical coding. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 5 (2014), 153-69.