Designing Audience Flow State in Narrative Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/yepbwa12Keywords:
Flow state, story continuity, audience relatability, narrative media, emotional engagement.Abstract
Narrative media emerges its flow state model from a relationship between audience relatability and narrative continuity. When viewers engage with a story, their cognitive abilities and emotional investment interact with the coherence of the narrative, which determines the depth of immersion. Existing research highlights that textual cohesion, probabilistic continuity, and emotional transitions are key to sustaining flow when receiving stories through media. However, cultural background and audience familiarity with storytelling conventions also influence the interpretation of story content and, therefore, cause different degrees of immersive experiences. This study proposes a Two-Dimensional Flow Framework, categorizing factors for flow state into relatability—how much the viewer identifies with the story—and continuity—the logical progression of the narrative. Misalignment in these dimensions can lead to disengagement through negative emotions. This framework allows creators to craft narratives that sustain audience engagement without overwhelming or under-stimulating them through curating the relationship between audience relatability and narrative continuity. The findings suggest that cognitive compatibility and emotional resonance deepen audience connection and sustained participation, so future storytellers should consider these factors when designing narrative media.
Downloads
References
[1] Brechman, J. M. 2010. Narrative “Flow”: A model of narrative processing and its impact on information processing. knowledge acquisition and persuasion.
[2] Bulitko, V. 2015. A call for flow modeling in interactive storytelling. Position Paper.
[3] Cohn, N. 2019. Your brain on comics: A cognitive model of visual narrative comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12, 352-386.
[4] Doyle, C. L. 2017. Creative flow as a unique cognitive process. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 280490.
[5] Jenova, C. 2007. Flow in games (and everything else). Commun. ACM 50, 4 (April 2007), 31–34.
[6] Nabi, R. L., & Green, M. C. 2015. The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18 (2), 137–162.
[7] Ros, V., & Kiss, M. 2018. Disrupted PECMA Flows: A Cognitive Approach to the Experience of Narrative Complexity in Film. Projections, 12 (1), 71-96.
[8] Sánchez Trigo, C. 2022. Agency and Interactivity in the Narrative Video Game ‘What Remains of Edith Finch’; Exploring Rita Felski’s.
[9] Sap, M., Jafarpour, A., Choi, Y., Smith, N. A., Pennebaker, J., & Horvitz, E. 2022. Quantifying the narrative flow of imagined versus autobiographical stories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119 (32).
[10] Song, H., Park, B., Park, H., & Shim, W. 2021. Cognitive and neural state dynamics of narrative comprehension. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41 (41), 8972-8990.
[11] Tikka, P., Kauttonen, J., & Hlushchuk, Y. 2018. Narrative comprehension beyond language: Common brain networks activated by a movie and its script. PLoS ONE, 13 (7).
[12] Zhang, R., Li, W., Liu, N., & Gao, D. 2016. Coherent narrative summarization with a cognitive model. Computer Speech & Language, 35, 134–160.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.